KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAHAN DALAM E-GOVERNMENT
Keywords:
komunikasi, pemerintahan, e-governmentSynopsis
Buku ini membahas secara komprehensif dinamika komunikasi pemerintahan di era digital, dengan fokus pada penerapan e-government sebagai instrumen utama modernisasi birokrasi dan pelayanan publik. Di tengah perkembangan pesat teknologi informasi, pemerintah di seluruh dunia, termasuk Indonesia, dihadapkan pada tuntutan untuk mempercepat transformasi digital demi mewujudkan tata kelola yang transparan, responsif, dan partisipatif.
Pembahasan dimulai dengan landasan konseptual mengenai e-government dan peran komunikasi pemerintahan sebagai penghubung antara negara dan masyarakat. Selanjutnya, buku ini menguraikan strategi komunikasi melalui media sosial, website resmi, serta pemanfaatan big data untuk analisis opini publik dan perumusan kebijakan. Isu-isu aktual seperti potensi dan risiko disinformasi berbasis kecerdasan buatan, strategi adaptasi birokrasi di era teknologi prediktif, hingga studi kasus internasional dan nasional disajikan untuk memberikan gambaran nyata praktik terbaik dan tantangan yang dihadapi berbagai negara.
Tidak hanya memaparkan peluang, buku ini juga mengkritisi risiko yang dapat muncul, seperti bias algoritma, pelanggaran privasi, dan kesenjangan digital, sekaligus menawarkan kerangka solusi yang menekankan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan partisipasi publik. Dengan pendekatan multidisiplin dan disertai rujukan akademis terkini, buku ini diharapkan menjadi panduan bagi akademisi, praktisi pemerintahan, pembuat kebijakan, serta masyarakat luas yang ingin memahami dan mengembangkan komunikasi pemerintahan yang efektif di era digital.
Buku ini bukan hanya memaparkan teori, tetapi juga mengajak pembaca untuk merefleksikan bagaimana teknologi dapat dimanfaatkan secara etis dan inklusif, sehingga e-government benar-benar menjadi sarana pemberdayaan warga dan penguatan demokrasi di tengah gelombang transformasi digital global.
Chapters
-
KATA PENGANTAR
-
DAFTAR ISI
-
BAB 1 KONSEP DASAR KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAHAN
-
BAB 2 E-GOVERNMENT DAN TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL PEMERINTAHAN
-
BAB 3 STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH DI ERA DIGITAL
-
BAB 4 KETERLIBATAN PUBLIK DAN PARTISIPASI DIGITAL
-
BAB 5 ETIKA, REGULASI DAN KEAMANAN INFORMASI PEMERINTAH
-
BAB 6 INDIKATOR KEAMANAN INFORMASI PEMERINTAH
-
BAB 7 EVALUASI DAN INOVASI DALAM KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH
-
BAB 8 MASA DEPAN KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAHAN DI ERA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DAN BIG DATA
-
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
-
PROFIL PENULIS
Downloads
References
Basher, R. (2006). Global early warning systems for natural hazards: Systematic and people-centred. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364(1845), 2167–2182.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1819
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
Chong, Z. J., Qin, B., Bandyopadhyay, T., Wongpiromsarn, T., & Ang, M. H. (2018). Autonomous urban driving: Preliminary results and experiences from Naist-Nanyang autonomous vehicle. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2016). There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538(7625), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a
Dahlgren, P. (2013). The political web: Media, participation and alternative democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Davies, T., & Bawa, Z. A. (2012). The promises and perils of open government data. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2).
DiResta, R., Shaffer, K., & Ruppel, B. (2019). The tactics and tropes of the Internet Research Agency. New Knowledge.
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
Eom, S. J., & Kim, J. (2014). The adoption of public participatory GIS in e-government service: The case of South Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 163–172.
European Commission. (2020). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Publications Office of the European Union.
Ferrara, E. (2020). What types of COVID-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots?. First Monday, 25(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i6.10633
Fung, A., Gilman, H. R., & Shkabatur, J. (2013). Six models for the Internet + politics. International Studies Review, 15(1), 30–47.
Halonen, J. I. (2012). Preventing long-term unemployment: Active labour market policies in Finland. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(S1), S21–S31.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.00874.x
Helbing, D. (2015). Thinking ahead – Essays on big data, digital revolution, and participatory market society. Springer.
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy's fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press.
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2017). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003
Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Sage.
Kwon, O., Lee, N., & Shin, B. (2014). Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 34(3), 387–394.
Lee, J., Kim, H., & Kim, Y. (2020). Smart city strategies—Technology applications in sustainable urban development. Sustainability, 12(17), 6960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176960
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen co-production in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
Meijer, A., & Bekkers, V. (2015). A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 237–245.
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. PublicAffairs.
Muramatsu, N., & Akiyama, H. (2011). Japan: Super-aging society preparing for the future. The Gerontologist, 51(4), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr067
Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 12–20.
Norris, P., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Public sector information and e-government: The role of ICT in modernizing government. Routledge.
OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019. OECD Publishing.
Pew Research Center. (2020). Public attitudes toward technology companies. Pew Research Center.
Romanosky, S. (2016). Examining the costs and causes of cyber incidents. Journal of Cybersecurity, 2(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyw001
Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Towards cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the use of social media and other information technologies for political activism and social movements. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 365–378.
Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014). Smart governance: A roadmap for research and practice. iConference 2014 Proceedings.
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Evaluating the use of big data analytics in government: A study of the UK public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.008
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.
UNESCO. (2021). AI and the future of knowledge. UNESCO Publishing.
United Nations. (2020). E-Government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe report.
Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A., & Jaafar, N. I. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 291–301.
Waweru, F., & McMahon, S. (2020). Innovation in health service delivery: The case of drone delivery of blood products in Rwanda. Journal of Health Logistics, 2(1), 1–10.
West, D. M. (2005). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton University Press.
World Bank. (2021). Data-driven decision-making in the public sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zheng, L., & Zheng, T. (2014). Innovation through social media in the public sector: Information and interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(S1), S106–S117.
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2012). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 10(2), 156–172.
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
