INKLUSIVITAS POLITIK ERA DIGITAL: Perspektif Kritis dari Analisis Sentimen dan Topik.

Authors

Dr. Rupiarsieh, M.Si
Universitas Bojonegoro image/svg+xml
Ahmad Suprastiyo
Universitas Bojonegoro image/svg+xml
Eko Wahyu Abryandoko.
Universitas Bojonegoro image/svg+xml
Agustinus Bimo Gumelar

Keywords:

INKLUSIVITAS POLITIK ERA DIGITAL, INKLUSIVITAS POLITIK, ERA DIGITAL, PERSPEKTIF KRITIS, ANALISIS SENTIMEN, TOPIK

Synopsis

Buku berjudul Inklusivitas Politik Era Digital: Perspektif Kritis dari Analisis Sentimen dan Topik ini lahir dari kerisauan sekaligus optimisme: kerisauan karena kesenjangan partisipasi politik kelompok difabel, perempuan, dan pemilih pemula masih terasa, serta optimisme karena ruang digital membuka peluang baru untuk mengurangi ketimpangan itu.

Tujuan penulisan buku ini adalah untuk menghubungkan riset big data dengan praktik kebijakan. Analisis sentimen dan topik atas jutaan unggahan media sosial memberi gambaran granular tentang hambatan dan harapan warga. Temuan kuantitatif diperkaya pembacaan kualitatif, lalu diterjemahkan menjadi strategi kurikulum, komunikasi, dan kebijakan inklusif. Harapannya, buku ini bisa menjadi jembatan antara dunia akademik, lembaga penyelenggara pemilu, organisasi masyarakat sipil, dan pembaca umum yang ingin memahami isu demokrasi inklusif secara lebih mendalam.

Struktur buku dirancang berjenjang. Bab 1 membuka konsep dan ruang lingkup inklusivitas. Bab 2 memetakan media sosial sebagai arena politik baru. Bab 3 menjelaskan metodologi analisis data, sedangkan Bab 4 menyajikan hasil empiris. Bab 5 menginterpretasikan temuan dalam kerangka hambatan dan peluang, diikuti Bab 6 yang merumuskan strategi pendidikan politik inklusif berbasis bukti. Bab 7 menutup dengan rekomendasi dan arah masa depan. Lampiran menyediakan kata kunci, panduan metodologi tambahan, dan daftar pustaka terkini.

Kerangka analisis dan rekomendasi di dalam buku ini diharapkan dapat memicu diskusi lanjut, riset replikasi, dan kebijakan nyata yang lebih berpihak pada prinsip demokrasi inklusif. Selamat membaca!

Chapters

  • KATA PENGANTAR
  • KATA PENGANTAR
  • DAFTAR ISI
  • DAFTAR GAMBAR
  • DAFTAR TABEL
  • INKLUSIVITAS POLITIK
    KONSEP, KESENJANGAN, DAN TANTANGAN DI ERA DIGITAL
  • MEDIA SOSIAL SEBAGAI ARENA POLITIK BARU
  • DARI DATA KE NARASI: METODOLOGI ANALISIS SENTIMEN DAN TOPIK
  • SUARA DIFABEL, PEREMPUAN, DAN PEMILIH PEMULA: HASIL ANALISIS
  • INTERPRETASI TEMUAN
    HAMBATAN, PELUANG, DAN HARAPAN
  • MENYUSUN STRATEGI PENDIDIKAN POLITIK INKLUSIF BERBASIS BUKTI
  • REKOMENDASI DAN ARAH MASA DEPAN DEMOKRASI INKLUSIF
  • GLOSARIUM
  • DAFTAR PUSTAKA
  • BIOGRAFI PENULIS

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Rupiarsieh, M.Si, Universitas Bojonegoro

Dr. Rupiarsieh, M.Si

Rupiarsieh merupakan dosen di Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (FISIP) di Universitas Bojonegoro (UNIGORO) Indonesia, dengan jabatan terakhir sebagai Dekan FISIP. Ia memperoleh gelar sarjana dalam Hubungan Internasional dari Universitas Negeri Jember Indonesia pada tahun 1986 dan gelar magister dalam ilmu politik dari Universitas Gadjah Mada Indonesia pada tahun 1995. Gelar doktor dalam Ilmu Administrasi diperoleh dari Universitas Tujuh Belas Agustus Surabaya, Indonesia, pada tahun 2007. Minat penelitiannya meliputi kebijakan sosial dan politik, teknologi pendidikan, dan manajemen hubungan pelanggan (CRM). Dapat dihubungi melalui

email: [email protected].

Ahmad Suprastiyo, Universitas Bojonegoro

Dr. Ahmad Suprastiyo, S.Sos., M.Si

Dosen pada Program Studi Administrasi Publik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Bojonegoro yang menekuni bidang kebijakan dan manajemen publik. Lahir di Bojonegoro, 27 April 1989. Menyelesaikan pendidikan Sarjana pada Program Studi Administrasi Negara Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Bojonegoro tahun 2012, menyelesaikan studi S2 pada Magister Administrasi Publik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Wijaya Putra tahun 2014 dan menyelesaikan studi S3 Doktor Administrasi Publik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Diponegoro tahun 2024. Selama menjalani karir sebagai Dosen pernah menjabat sebagai Sekretaris Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu Universitas Bojonegoro dan sekarang menjabat sebagai Ketua Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu Universitas Bojonegoro. Penulis juga aktif melakukan pengabdian dan penelitian yang dibiayai oleh Dikti dalam skema Penelitian Dosen Pemula (PDD), skema Penelitian Disertasi Doktor (PDD) dan skema Penelitian Fundamental Reguler (PFR).

 

Eko Wahyu Abryandoko., Universitas Bojonegoro

Dr. Eko Wahyu Abryandoko.,S.pd.,MT

Eko Wahyu Abryandoko merupakan dosen di Universitas Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Ia memperoleh gelar Doktor dalam bidang Teknik dari Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia. Minat penelitiannya meliputi desain mekanik, kontrol adaptif, Sistem Teknik Pengembangan Produk, Teknologi Bantu, dan Teknik Biomedis.

 

 

Agustinus Bimo Gumelar

Agustinus Bimo Gumelar

Agustinus Bimo Gumelar (Dr.), Insinyur (Ir.) dalam bidang Komputasi Afektif Neurosains – Peneliti Profesional dibidang Interaksi Manusia-Komputer (HCI). Spesialisasi dalam bidang ilmu saraf afektif pada komputasi neuromorfis, dan interaksi manusia-komputer (HCI) dengan fokus pada peningkatan pengalaman pelanggan (CX) melalui teknologi inovatif.

 

References

1. VERBA S, SCHLOZMAN KL, BRADY HE. Voice and Equality [Internet]. Harvard University Press; 1995. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1pnc1k7

2. Fraser N. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Soc Text [Internet]. 1990 Jul 21;(25/26):56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/466240

3. Dean Rikki. Deliberating Like a State: Locating Public Administration Within the Deliberative System. Polit Stud [Internet]. 2023 Apr 25;72(3):924–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231166285

4. Fung A. Varieties of Public Participation in Complex Governance. Public Adm Rev - PUBLIC ADMIN REV. 2006 Dec 1;66:66–75.

5. Sen A. Development as Freedom [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1999. (Oxford India paperbacks). Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NQs75PEa618C

6. Gracia P. Book Review: The Digital Disconnect: The Social Causes and Consequences of Digital Inequalities. New Media Soc. 2021 Dec 7;24:250–1.

7. Lister M, Dovey J, Giddings S, Grant I, Kelly K. New Media: A Critical Introduction. In 2003. p. 404.

8. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (Indonesia PP. Badan Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara. Sekretariat Negara (dalam LN tercatat “LL SETNEG”); 2017. p. 317 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.

9. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (Indonesia PP. Badan Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara. 2016 [cited 2025 Jul 22]. p. 70 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas. Available from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37251/uu-no-8-tahun-2016

10. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (Indonesia PP. Badan Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara. 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 22]. p. 21 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Available from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/274494/uu-no-1-tahun-2024

11. Muharam RS, Pradhanawati A, Fitriyah F, Supratiwi S. Fulfillment of women’s political rights through mainstreaming gender quotas in Election Supervisory Board. Otoritas J Ilmu Pemerintah [Internet]. 2023 Dec 26;13(3):406–23. Available from: https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/Otoritas/article/view/12691

12. Kadriyah SM. Women’s Representation and Accessibility in Indonesian Politics: A Study of Jakarta Regional People’s Representative Council. J Polit [Internet]. 2023 Aug 25;9(2). Available from: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/politik/vol9/iss2/4/

13. TEORELL J, TORCAL M. Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In: Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies [Internet]. 1st ed. Routledge; 2007. p. 358–81. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134126811/chapters/10.4324/9780203965757-24

14. Verba S, Nie NH. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987. 452 p.

15. Temby Q, Hu B. Polarisation on- and off-line in Indonesia’s 2019 Presidential Elections. Perspect ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Inst. 2019;(26):1–9.

16. Gayo-Avello D. A Meta-Analysis of State-of-the-Art Electoral Prediction From Twitter Data. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2013 Dec 1;31:649–79.

17. Ceron A, Curini L, Iacus S. Politics and Big Data: Nowcasting and Forecasting Elections with Social Media. Politics and Big Data: Nowcasting and Forecasting Elections with Social Media. 2016. 1–178 p.

18. Aspinall Edward, White Sally, Savirani Amalinda. Women’s Political Representation in Indonesia: Who Wins and How? J Curr Southeast Asian Aff [Internet]. 2021 Apr 1;40(1):3–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421989720

19. Hughes B. Disability and the Body. In 2014. p. 55–61.

20. Ging D, Siapera E. Special issue on online misogyny. Fem Media Stud [Internet]. 2018;18(4):515–24. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345

21. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. Living With Contradict Controv Fem Soc Ethics. 2018;1989(1):39–52.

22. Yu H, Robinson DG. The New Ambiguity of “Open Government.” SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2012;31. Available from: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2012489

23. Fisher J, Fieldhouse E, Franklin MN, Gibson R, Cantijoch M, Wlezien C. the Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. 2017. 1–550 p.

24. Kittilson MC. Party Politics. In: Waylen G, Celis K, Kantola J, Weldon SL, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 0. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0021

25. Abbey R. Cass R. Sunstein. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017. Pp. xi+310. $29.95. Am Polit Thought [Internet]. 2018 Mar 1;7(2):370–3. Available from: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/696988

26. Tucker J, Guess A, Barbera P, Vaccari C, Siegel A, Sanovich S, et al. Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. SSRN Electron J. 2018 Jan 1;

27. Laer J, Aelst P. Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires. Information. 2010 Dec 1;Communication & Society:1146–71.

28. Bennett L, Segerberg A. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Log Connect Action Digit Media Pers Contentious Polit. 2012 Jan 1;15:1–240.

29. Schillemans T. The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Public Adm. 2014 Dec 1;92.

30. Vissers S, Stolle D. The Internet and new modes of political participation: Online versus offline participation. Information. 2014 Sep 14;17.

31. Bruns A, Highfield T, Burgess J. The Arab Spring and Social Media Audiences English and Arabic Twitter Users and Their Networks. Am Behav Sci. 2013 Jul 1;57:871–98.

32. Rowland F. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You (review). portal Libr Acad [Internet]. 2011 Oct;11(4):1009–11. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/452645

33. Ross K, Evans E, Harrison L, Shears M, Wadia K. The Gender of News and News of Gender A Study of Sex, Politics, and Press Coverage of the 2010 British General Election. Int J Press. 2013 Jan 1;18:3–20.

34. Shepherd J. Disability and the media. Disabil Soc. 2016 Nov 4;32:1–2.

35. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2017. 520 p. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eTwmDwAAQBAJ

36. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2003. 768 p. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=F8BFOM8DCKoC

37. Denzin NK. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods [Internet]. Routledge; 2017. 368 p. (Methodological perspectives). Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UjcpxFE0T4cC

38. Wilie B, Vincentio K, Winata G, Li X, Lim Z, Soleman S, et al. IndoNLU: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Understanding. 2020.

39. Blei D, Ng A, Jordan M. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Vol. 3, The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2001. 601–608 p.

40. Bruns A, Stieglitz S. Towards More Systematic Twitter Analysis: Metrics for Tweeting Activities. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 1;16:91–108.

41. Broder A. On the Resemblance and Containment of Documents. Proceedings of the International Conference on Compression and Complexity of Sequences. 1997.

42. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough? F Methods - F METHOD. 2006 Feb 1;18:59–82.

43. Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, Flammini A. The Rise of Social Bots. Commun ACM. 2014 Jul 19;59.

44. Cohen J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46.

45. Krippendorff K. Computing Krippendorff’s Alpha-Reliability. 2011.

46. Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. 2018.

47. Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schütze H. Introduction to Information Retrieval [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/669D108D20F556C5C30957D63B5AB65C

48. Efron B. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Ann Stat [Internet]. 1979 Jan 1;7(1). Available from: https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-statistics/volume-7/issue-1/Bootstrap-Methods-Another-Look-at-the-Jackknife/10.1214/aos/1176344552.full

49. Mehrabi N, Morstatter F, Saxena N, Lerman K, Galstyan A. A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Comput Surv. 2021 Jul 1;54:1–35.

50. Jurafsky M. Speech and Language Processing An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition with Language Models Third Edition draft Summary of Contents. Women’s Hum Rights. 2014;vii–x.

51. Röder M, Both A, Hinneburg A. Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures. WSDM 2015 - Proc 8th ACM Int Conf Web Search Data Min. 2015 Feb 2;399–408.

52. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2018. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=nE1aDwAAQBAJ

53. Nunes JL, Barbosa G, de Souza C, Barbosa S. Using Model Cards for ethical reflection on machine learning models: an interview-based study. J Interact Syst. 2024 Jan 1;15:1–19.

54. General Election Network for Disability Access (AGENDA) & Jaringan Pendidikan Pemilih untuk Rakyat (JPPR); didukung IFES. 2014 Presidential Elections in Indonesia: Monitoring Results from Aceh, Jakarta, Central Java, South Kalimantan and South Sulawesi. Jakarta; 2015.

55. Fernandes A, Suryahudaya EG, Okhtariza N. Pemilih Muda Dalam Pemilihan Umum 2024: Dinamis , Adaptif dan Responsif. Cent Strateg Int Stud [Internet]. 2023;8. Available from: https://s3-csis-web.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/doc/Pemilih_Muda_Dalam_Pemilihan_Umum_2024.pdf?download=1

56. Gupta K, Jenkins-Smith H. Anthony Downs, “Up and Down with Ecology: The ‘Issue-Attention’ Cycle.” In 2016. p. 316–25.

57. Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd Edition (Longman Classics in Political Science). Longman Pub Group; 2002. 280 p.

58. Hug T. Microlearning : A New Pedagogical Challenge. 2006. 7–11 p.

59. Kanter RM. Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women. Am J Sociol [Internet]. 1977 Mar;82(5):965–90. Available from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/226425

60. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar 1;84:191–215.

61. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science (80- ) [Internet]. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124–31. Available from: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

62. Colquitt JA. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol [Internet]. 2001 Jun;86(3):386–400. Available from: https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

63. van Deursen AJAM, Helsper EJ. The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? In 2015. p. 29–52. Available from: http://www.emerald.com/books/edited-volume/11159/chapter/80957701

64. Nabatchi T, Leighninger M. Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. 2015.

65. Pawson R. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2006. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=XNhGhWiXgDcC

66. Pea RD. The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity. J Learn Sci [Internet]. 2004 Jul;13(3):423–51. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6

67. Topping KJ. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. High Educ [Internet]. 1996 Oct;32(3):321–45. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00138870

68. Herron ES, Pekkanen R, Shugart MS. The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2018. (Oxford handbooks). Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=H5NODwAAQBAJ

69. FUNG A, WRIGHT EO. Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Polit Soc [Internet]. 2001 Mar 1;29(1):5–41. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329201029001002

70. Rose D, Meyer A. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design For Learning. Alexandria, VA, ASCD. 2002.

71. Villamediana J, Küster I, Vila N. Destination engagement on Facebook: Time and seasonality. Ann Tour Res [Internet]. 2019 Nov;79:102747. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160738319301045

72. Schriver KA. Plain Language in the US Gains Momentum: 1940–2015. IEEE Trans Prof Commun [Internet]. 2017 Dec;60(4):343–83. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8115322/

73. Grunig JE. Two-Way Symmetrical Public Relations: Past, Present, and Future. In: Handbook of Public Relations [Internet]. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2001. p. 11–30. Available from: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/handbook-of-public-relations/n1.xml

74. Cairney P. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2016. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-51781-4

75. Menard S. Handbook of Longitudinal Research: Design, Measurement, and Analysis Editor. 2008 Jan 1;

76. Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H. Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [Internet]. IEEE; 2014. p. 3025–34. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6758978/

77. Buolamwini J, Gebru T. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In: Friedler SA, Wilson C, editors. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency [Internet]. PMLR; 2018. p. 77–91. (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research; vol. 81). Available from: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html

78. Seok S, DaCosta B, Hodges R. A Systematic Review of Empirically Based Universal Design for Learning: Implementation and Effectiveness of Universal Design in Education for Students with and without Disabilities at the Postsecondary Level. Open J Soc Sci [Internet]. 2018;6(5). Available from: https://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciples.htm

79. Pasquale F. The Black Box Society [Internet]. Harvard University Press; 2015. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061/html

INKLUSIVITAS POLITIK ERA DIGITAL: Perspektif Kritis dari Analisis Sentimen dan Topik.

Downloads

google playbook
PREVIEW

Published

December 18, 2025
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Rupiarsieh, M.Si, Dr. Ahmad Suprastiyo, S.Sos., M.Si, Dr. Eko Wahyu Abryandoko.,S.pd.,MT, Agustinus Bimo Gumelar (Author)

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Details about the available publication format: PREVIEW

PREVIEW

ISBN-13 (15)

978-634-202-981-7

Physical Dimensions

How to Cite

INKLUSIVITAS POLITIK ERA DIGITAL: Perspektif Kritis dari Analisis Sentimen dan Topik. (2025). Library Buku Penerbit KBM. https://librarypenerbitkbm.science/index.php/buku/catalog/book/841