MEDIA SUMBER BELAJAR
Keywords:
media, sumber belajarSynopsis
Buku Media dan Sumber Belajar hadir sebagai panduan komprehensif bagi dosen, guru, mahasiswa, dan peneliti pendidikan dalam memahami, merancang, serta mengimplementasikan media pembelajaran secara kreatif dan berlandaskan nilai-nilai Islam. Di tengah arus digitalisasi dan disrupsi teknologi, buku ini menegaskan kembali bahwa media bukan sekadar alat bantu mengajar, melainkan jembatan spiritual antara ilmu, iman, dan amal.
Melalui dua belas bab yang terstruktur, buku ini mengupas mulai dari landasan filosofis dan teologis media pembelajaran, teori-teori psikologi belajar, hingga penerapan teknologi terkini seperti e-learning, artificial intelligence (AI), multimedia interaktif, dan media berbasis komputer. Setiap bab dilengkapi dengan analisis mendalam tentang desain teks, audio, visual, dan video sebagai bagian dari ekosistem pembelajaran digital yang bernilai edukatif sekaligus dakwah.
Selain membahas aspek teknis, buku ini juga menyoroti dimensi moral, spiritual, dan sosial dalam penggunaan media pendidikan. Integrasi riset dan pengabdian masyarakat (PkM) dijelaskan secara aplikatif, menampilkan contoh konkret penerapan media digital dalam kegiatan pelatihan guru, dakwah edukatif, hingga pendampingan literasi digital di sekolah dan pesantren.
Sebagai sintesis, bagian akhir buku menawarkan refleksi filosofis bahwa pembelajaran adalah ibadah dan media merupakan wasilah menuju ilmu yang bermanfaat. Pesan inspiratif belajar sepanjang hayat (lifelong learning) menjadi penutup yang menegaskan pentingnya semangat inovasi berkelanjutan, diiringi akhlak dan nilai tauhid.
Buku ini tidak hanya menjadi referensi akademik, tetapi juga sumber inspirasi bagi pendidik Muslim untuk menjadi Mujaddid, pembaharu pendidikan yang mampu memadukan teknologi modern dengan nilai-nilai ilahiah. Dengan gaya penulisan ilmiah, kutipan Al-Qur’an, dan rujukan jurnal bereputasi, karya ini layak dijadikan pegangan utama dalam mata kuliah Teknologi Pendidikan, Desain Media Pembelajaran, maupun Pengembangan Sumber Belajar berbasis Islam.
Chapters
-
KATA PENGANTAR
-
PRAKATA
-
DAFTAR ISI
-
DAFTAR TABEL
-
BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN MEDIA SUMBER BELAJAR
-
BAB 2 KONSEP DASAR MEDIA SUMBER BELAJAR
-
BAB 3 TEORI BELAJAR DAN RELEVANSI DENGAN MEDIA
-
BAB 4 JENIS DAN BENTUK MEDIA SUMBER BELAJAR
-
BAB 5 PRINSIP DAN DESAIN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN
-
BAB 6 PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA SUMBER BELAJAR
-
BAB 7 EVALUASI MEDIA SUMBER BELAJAR
-
BAB 8 INTEGRASI MEDIA, SAINS, DAN NILAI ISLAM
-
BAB 9 TANTANGAN DAN SOLUSI DALAM PEMANFAATAN MEDIA
-
BAB 10 PRAKTIK BAIK DAN STUDI
-
BAB 11 RISET DAN PKM DALAM MEDIA SUMBER BELAJAR
-
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
-
GLOSARIUM
-
INDEKS
-
BIOGRAFI PENULIS
-
HASIL SCANNING SIMILARITY
Downloads
References
1. Abdullah, M. (2021). Integrated curriculum and Islamic pedagogy: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 9(1), 33–49.
2. Abdullah, M. (2021). Islamic epistemology and integration of science: A contemporary perspective. Journal of Islamic Studies, 32(4), 455–472.
3. Abdullah, M. (2021). Religious moderation and digital media discourse in Indonesia. Journal of Religion and Society, 23(4), 301–318.
4. Ahmad, S., & Basri, M. (2021). Digital da‘wah and youth engagement on YouTube: A systematic review. Journal of Islamic Media Studies, 12(3), 145–162.
5. Ali, S., & Rahman, F. (2023). STEM education and Qur’anic worldview: Towards integrative curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(1), 88–107.*
6. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1999). Islam and secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
7. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1999). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
8. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2021). Islamic worldview and contemporary challenges of digital media. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 20(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.20.2021.002
9. Al-Bukhārī, M. I. (2020). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dār Ṭawq al-Najāh.
10. Alim, A., & Rahman, F. (2022). Ethical issues in digital Islamic education during and after COVID-Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(4), 214–229.
https://jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/4392
11. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2020). Fiqh al-dakwah wa al-tarbiyah fī al-ʿaṣr al-rāhin. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.
12. Al-Qur’an al-Karīm. (2020). Mushaf Madinah. King Fahd Printing Complex.
13. Al-Qur’an. (n.d.). Surah Al-‘Alaq: 1.
14. Al-Qur’an. (n.d.). Surah An-Nahl: 125.
15. Al-Qur’an. (n.d.). Surah Az-Zumar: 9.
16. Al-Qur’an. (n.d.). Surah Ṭāhā: 114.
17. Al-Tirmidhī, M. I. (2020). Sunan al-Tirmidhī. Dār al-Ta’sīl.
18. Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications (7th ed.). Worth Publishers.
19. Arsyad, A. (2013). Media pembelajaran (Revisi ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
20. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
22. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
23. Bannister, A. (2017). The power of visual learning: How visuals enhance learning and retention. International Journal of Educational Research, 78, 1–10. [Scopus Q2]
24. Basri, H., & Syamsuddin, S. (2022). Islamic media literacy and youth engagement in the digital age. Journal of Media and Religion, 21(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2022.2058217
25. Bernard, M. L., et al. (2001). Effect of text size and type on the readability of computer-displayed text. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(3), 221–231. [Scopus Q2]
26. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2020). Self-concept and self-efficacy revisited: A few notable differences and important similarities. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1784713
27. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. [Scopus Q2]
28. Bruner, J. S. (1966). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
29. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. [Scopus Q1]
30. Classover Holdings, Inc. (2025). Affordable small group interactive classes. SEC Filing S-1/A (September 11, 2025).
31. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. [Scopus Q1]
32. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9–15. [Scopus Q3]
33. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
34. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. [Scopus Q2]
35. Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x
36. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
37. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
38. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 799–804. [Scopus Q1]
39. Habibi, A., & Yusof, Y. (2023). Integrating STEAM and Islamic education: A framework for holistic learning. International Journal of Social Learning, 3(2).
40. Hadis Riwayat Ibnu Majah, Sunan Ibnu Majah, No. 224.
41. Hamalik, O. (2011). Proses belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
42. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
43. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
44. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
45. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
46. Huang, W. D., et al. (2019). The effectiveness of mobile learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 1–12. [Scopus Q1]
47. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
48. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (2020). Cooperation in the classroom (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. [Scopus Q2]
49. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Karpova, E., et al. (2020). The role of digital media in education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101–110. [Scopus Q2]
51. Kaya, N., & Epps, H. H. (2004). Color and emotion in the context of a learning environment. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 23(3), 227–235. [Scopus Q2]
52. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Laporan pendidikan nasional 2023. Jakarta: Kemendikbud RI.
53. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
54. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. Loh, A., et al. (2010). The effect of font size on reading performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 303–320. [Scopus Q3]
56. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
57. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
58. Mayer, R. E. (2019). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Scopus Q1]
59. McGraw Hill. (2025). Digital learning solutions and AI-powered assessments (Annual Report 2025). New York: McGraw Hill.
60. McGraw Hill. (2025). Innovations in digital pedagogy and learning technologies (Annual Report 2025). New York: McGraw Hill.
61. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Bakia, M. (2014). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education. [Scopus Q2]
62. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
63. PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk. (2025). Encouraging the digitalization of the education sector (Laporan Tahunan). Jakarta: Telkom Indonesia.
64. Readvantage Corp. (2025). Bionic reading and cognitive efficiency in digital learning. Zurich: Readvantage Research Division.
65. ogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Merrill Publishing Company.
66. Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Academic Press.
67. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
68. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
69. Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
70. Sulaiman, A. (2016). The role of radio in education: A case study in developing countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 50, 1–8. [Scopus Q2]
71. Tufte, E. R. (2006). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
72. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
73. Wang, F. (2016). The role of online learning in education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 78, 1–12. [Scopus Q2]
74. World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1600-0
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
