LITERASI HUKUM: Memahami, Menggunakan, dan Mengkritisi Hukum
Keywords:
literasi, hukumSynopsis
Hukum hari-hari ini dipersepsikan sebagai hutan gelap yang rumit, teknis, dan eksklusif bagi kalangan tertentu. Buku Literasi Hukum hadir untuk meruntuhkan tembok tersebut dengan menawarkan pendekatan yang inklusif, reflektif, dan sistematis. Buku ini tidak hanya menjawab apa itu hukum, tetapi membekali pembaca dengan kompas untuk memahami bagaimana cara membaca, menafsirkan, menalar, hingga mengomunikasikan hukum dalam realitas kehidupan.
Narasi dimulai dengan membedah arsitektur sistem hukum Indonesia sebagai entitas yang hidup—hasil persilangan sejarah, dinamika politik, dan transformasi sosial. Dari landasan ini, penulis membangun konsep literasi hukum melampaui sekadar sebagai pengetahuan teks, yakni sebagai kompetensi berlapis yang mencakup keterampilan praktis sekaligus ketajaman reflektif-kritis.
Salah satu sorotan utama dalam buku ini adalah peran sentral bahasa. Penulis membedah bagaimana bahasa hukum dijadikan sebagai medium komunikasi sekaligus sebagai instrumen kekuasaan yang mampu membentuk atau bahkan mengaburkan makna hukum. Pembaca dipandu untuk menjembatani jurang antara bahasa akademik yang teoretis dan bahasa praktis yang pragmatis melalui konsep rekayasa konstruk hukum yang presisi.
Lebih jauh, buku ini menyediakan “kotak perkakas” (toolkits) bagi pembaca untuk melakukan riset hukum, membedah naskah peraturan, menganalisis putusan pengadilan, hingga mengurai kerumitan klausul kontrak. Pembahasan mendalam mengenai teknik pembuktian fakta dan strategi argumentasi hukum—mulai dari pendekatan deduktif, induktif, hingga penalaran kebalikan (a contrario)—disajikan untuk memperkuat daya nalar pembaca.
Sebagai penutup, buku ini mengajak pembaca merefleksikan dialektika dua cara berpikir utama: nalar praktis-strategis seorang pengacara dan nalar teoretis-analitis seorang ilmuwan hukum. Kombinasi keduanya adalah kunci untuk melihat hukum sebagai sebuah simfoni pemikiran yang utuh.
Ditujukan bagi mahasiswa, praktisi, akademisi, maupun masyarakat umum, buku ini adalah undangan untuk berhenti menjadi objek hukum yang pasif. Literasi Hukum menawarkan kedaulatan berpikir: sebuah kemampuan untuk mempertanyakan, memahami, dan menentukan sendiri bagaimana keadilan seharusnya ditegakkan.
Chapters
-
KATA PENGANTAR
-
DAFTAR ISI
-
BAB 01 PENDAHULUAN
-
BAB 02 KONSEP DASAR LITERASI HUKUM
-
BAB 03 HUBUNGAN LITERASI HUKUM DAN BAHASA HUKUM
-
BAB 04 MELAKUKAN RISET HUKUM
-
BAB 05 INTERPRETASI HUKUM
-
BAB 06 KOMUNIKASI HUKUM
-
BAB 07 PENUTUP
-
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
-
LAMPIRAN VISUALISASI DAN ANALISIS STRUKTUR LOGIS PENALARAN HUKUM
-
PROFIL PENULIS
Downloads
References
Adler, Mark. “The Plain Language Movement.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, edited by Lawrence M Solan and Peter M Tiersma, 67–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0006.
Alexy, Robert. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
———. Theorie Der Grundrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985.
Anshari, Tunggul, Setia Negara, and Dewi Cahyandari. “The Confrontational Role of the Constitutional Court’s Decisions in the Legislative Process.” International Journal of Criminal Justice Science 17, no. 1 (2022): 185–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756099.
Arbetman, Lee. “Street Law, Inc.: Context, History and Future.” IJPLE 2, no. 1 (2018): 3–27.
Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Translated by A.J. Jenkinson. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Library, 2015.
Bacon, Francis. Novum Organum. London: William Rawley, 1620.
———. Novum Organum. Translated by Peter Urbach and John Gibson. Chicago: Open Court, 1994.
Badan Pengkajian MPR RI. Penataan Ulang Jenis Dan Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Jakarta: R RI Bekerjasama dengan Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara-Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2017.
———. “Strategi Perampingan Dan Harmonisasi Regulasi Pusat Dan Daerah.” Jakarta, 2017.
Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers. Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Edited by Reza Banakar and Max Travers. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.
Black, Donald J. “The Mobilization of Law.” The Journal of Legal Studies 2, no. 1 (1973): 125–49.
Copi, Irving M., Carl Cohen, and Victor Rodych. Introduction to Logic. New York: Routledge, 2019.
Cotterrell, Roger. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
DeGrazia, David. “Moral Status as a Matter of Degree?” Southern Journal of Philosophy 46, no. 2 (2008): 181–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00075.x.
———. Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. The Philosophical Review. Vol. 107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.
Epstein, Lee, and Andrew D. Martin. An Introduction to Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan S. Silbey. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Fitriana, Tri Hayati, and Aloysius Uwiyono. “When Uniform Standards Are Missing: Judicial Inconsistency in Wages During Termination Proceedings in Indonesia.” The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies 5, no. 2 (2026). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2026v5n2.1.
Frank, Jerome. Law and the Modern Mind. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2009.
———. “The Courts and the Quest for Justice.” Yale Law Journal 65, no. 6 (1956): 961–84.
———. “What Courts Do in Fact.” Illinois Law Review 26, no. 6 (1931): 645–66.
Frege, Gottlob. Begriffsschrift: Eine Der Arithmetischen Nachgebildete Formelsprache Des Reinen Denkens. Halle: Louis Nebert, 1879.
———. Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Friedman, Lawrence M. Impact: How Law Affects Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.
———. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New Yor: Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.
Galdia, Marcus. “Conceptual Origins of Legal Linguistics.” Comparative Legilinguistics 47 (2021): 17–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/cl-2021-0011.
———. “Legal Constructs: Reflections on Legal-Linguistic Methodology.” Adam Mickiewicz University, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48226/978-83-66666-37-5.
———. Legal Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009.
Golub, Stephen. “Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy: The Legal Empowerment Alternative.” Rule of Law Series. Massachusetts Avenue, NW, 2003.
Goodrich, Peter. Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08818-8.
Goodrich, Peter, and Thanos Zartaloudis. The Cabinet of Imaginary Laws. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090925.
Harahap, Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198260509.003.0002.
Hegel, G.W.F. The Philosophy of Right. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2001.
Jhering, Rudolf von. Der Zweck Im Recht. Vol. I. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1877.
———. Der Zweck Im Recht. Vol. II. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1883.
John Rawls. A Theory of Justice, 1971.
Jr, Oliver Wendell Holmes. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review 457, no. 10 (1987): 194–96. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203077702-16.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. New Brunswick: Transaction, 2006.
———. Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in Die Rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke, 1934.
Kennedy, Helena. Eve Was Framed: Women and British Justice. London: Vintage, 1992.
Llewellyn, Karl N. Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Maarif, Ihsanul. “Dinamika Kedudukan Peraturan Lembaga Dalam Hierarki Perundang-Undangan: Tinjauan Yuridis Dan Perspektif Praktis.” Unnes Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 336–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.
MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.
MacCormick, Neil, and Fernando Atria. Law and Legal Interpretation. Farnham: Ashgate, 2003.
Markovits, Richard S. Matters of Principle: Legitimate Legal Argument and Constitutional Interpretation. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
Marlia, Iwa Lukmana, and Wawan Gunawan. “Contesting Indonesian Plain vs Legal Languages: Analysis of Effectiveness on Indonesian Controversial Law.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 13, no. 5 (2023): 1217–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1305.16.
Marlia, Jatmika Nurhadi, Diyas Puspandari, Indra Nugrahayu Taufik, Ida Widia, Siti Kodariah, Krisanjaya, and Lusi Komala Sari. “Plain Language Intervention To Improve Public Understanding of Legal Language: Descriptive Analysis of Controversial Articles in the Job Creation Law.” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 12, no. 2 (2024): e3224. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i2.3224.
Massier, Ab. Van ‘Recht’ Naar ‘Hukum’: Indonesische Juristen En Hun Taal, 1915–2000. Leiden: Leiden University, 2003.
McCann, Michael. “Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives.” Annual Review Law and Social Science 2 (2006): 17–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105917.
Mellinkoff, David. The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1963.
Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: John W. Parker, 1843.
Missleine, and Evi Retno Wulan. “The Principle Of Justice Ratio Decidendi Of The Judge In Decision Number 813 K / PID2-23 Asas Keadilan Ratio Decidendi Hakim Dalam Putusan Nomor 813.” Jurnal Hukum Sehasen 10, no. 813 (2024): 185–90.
Nawiasky, Hans. Allgemeine Rechtslehre: Systematische Grundlegung Der Rechtswissenschaft. Einsiedeln: Benziger, 1948.
Nonet, Philippe, and Philip Selznick. Toward Responsive Law: Law & Society in Transition. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume V: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.
Pelengkahu, Muhamad. “Green Criminology: Evolution, Typology, and Legal Framework for Environmental Protection.” Ius Poenale 6, no. 1 (2025): 37–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v6i1.4444.
———. “Interpretation, Inclusiveness, and Ambiguity: A Critique of Rule Design in Modern Legal System.” The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education 7, no. 2 (2025): 399–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v7i3.35150.
———. “Pancasila: Grundnorm or Grondslag?” Researchgate, 2025. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35516.91529.
———. “Rechtstransplantation v. Rechtsnachahmung.” Researchgate, 2025, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29992.48643.
———. “Reframing the Rule of Law: The Dialectic of Voluntas and Ratio in Kaarlo Tuori’s Thought.” Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría Del Derecho 20, no. e20270 (2026): 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2026.20.20270.
Pelengkahu, Muhamad, and Ridwan Yoga Pratama. “Climate Change Law Architecture Towards Golden Indonesia 2045: Lessons Learned from Kenya, Finland, and South Africa.” The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development 9, no. 2 (2024): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.9.2.85-96.
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
Pound, Roscoe. “An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law.” An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law, 2017, 1–306. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351288880.
———. “Law in Books and Law in Action.” American Law Review 44 (1910): 12–36.
Radbruch, Gustav. “Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy (1945).” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi042.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
Rorty, Richard M. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. London: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Russell, Bertrand, and Alfred North Whitehead. Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910.
Sagama, Suwardi. “Reformulasi Hierarki Peraturan Pada Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Volksgeist 1, no. 2 (2018): 185–97. https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1967.
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. Vom Beruf Unserer Zeit Für Gesetzgebung Und Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Mohr & Zimmer, 1814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.11451.
Schauer, Frederick. Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Sidharta, B. Arief. Pengantar Logika Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2012.
Slocum, Brian G. Ordinary Meaning: A Theory of the Most Fundamental Principle of Legal Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.
———. The Nature of Legal Interpretation: What Jurists Can Learn About Legal Interpretation from Linguistics and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Perspektif Teoritis Studi Hukum Dalam Masyarkat. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1985.
Spica, Elizabeth. “Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc .” Tennessee Law Review 90, no. 2 (2023). https://ir.law.utk.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1369&context=tennesseelawreview.
Stone, Christopher D. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann, Inc, 1972.
Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2014.
———. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2010.
Susilo, Erwin, and Dharma Setiawan Negara. “Ratio Decidendi Dan Obiter Dictum: Evolusi Konseptual Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Negara Hukum 16, no. 2 (2025): 165–81.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831982.
Tapp, June Louin, and Felice J. Levine. “Legal Socialization: Strategies for an Ethical Legality.” Stanford Law Review 27, no. 1 (1974): 1–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1227929.
Tiersma, Peter M. Legal Language. London: University of Chicago Press University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Tyler, Tom R. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.
Warrasih, Esmi. Pranata Hukum: Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2005.
Wedhatami, Bayangsari, Ratih Damayanti, and Cindy Ayu Prasasi. “Navigating Regional Regulatory Changes in Indonesia: An In-Depth Analysis of Post-Amendment Implementation of Law Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Formation.” Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang 9, no. 2 (2023): 237–64.
Wicaksono, Dian Agung, and Faiz Rahman. “Influencing or Intervention ? Impact of Constitutional Court Decisions on the Supreme Court in Indonesia.” Constitutional Review 8, no. 2 (2022): 260–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev823.
Wigmore, John Henry. A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1904.
Wignosubroto, Sutandyo. Hukum: Paradigma, Metode, Dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: Elsam Lembaga Studi Dan Advokasi Masyarakat, 2002.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1958.
———. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, 1922.
Published
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
