SISTEM REKOMENDASI KELOMPOK BELAJAR BERBASIS WEB 2.0
Keywords:
SISTEM REKOMENDASI, KELOMPOK BELAJAR, WEB 2.0Synopsis
Personalisasi Pembelajaran di Era Digital
Di tengah arus transformasi pendidikan yang semakin berpusat pada siswa, blended learning hadir bukan lagi sekadar pilihan, melainkan sebuah kebutuhan. Namun, pertanyaannya: bagaimana kita memastikan penggabungan pembelajaran tradisional dan online ini benar-benar berjalan efektif dan produktif?
Buku ini mengupas tuntas sinergi antara teknologi Web 2.0 dan Sistem Rekomendasi Berbasis Pengetahuan untuk menjawab tantangan tersebut. Dengan pendekatan yang inovatif, penulis membedah bagaimana aspek personalisasi—yang didasarkan pada gaya belajar VAK (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic) serta nilai pre-test siswa—mampu mengubah cara kelompok belajar dibentuk dan berinteraksi.
Melalui metodologi Design Research Methodology (DRM), buku ini membuktikan bahwa teknologi bukan sekadar alat bantu, melainkan katalisator yang mampu:
Meningkatkan hasil pembelajaran secara signifikan hingga 12,88%.
Memperkecil kesenjangan nilai antar-siswa di dalam kelas.
Mengoptimalkan produktivitas guru dan siswa dalam ekosistem blended learning.
Ditujukan bagi para pendidik, praktisi teknologi pendidikan, serta mahasiswa, buku ini menawarkan panduan strategis dalam membangun lingkungan belajar yang lebih cerdas, inklusif, dan personal di era digital.
Chapters
-
KATA PENGANTAR
-
DAFTAR ISI
-
01. PENDAHULUAN
-
02. TINJAUAN PUSTAKA
-
03. DESAIN DAN IMPLEMENTASI
-
04. PENUTUP
-
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
-
PROFIL PENULIS
Downloads
References
A. Armelliniand dan O. Aiyegbayo (2010): Learning design and assessment with e-tivities, Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 41, no. 6, 256–270.
Bennett, C. (1979): Individual differences and how teachers perceive them, The Social Studies, 70(2), 56-61.
Burke (2002): Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and Experiments, User modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 331-370.
Charlene Cassidy dan Kreitner B. (2009): Supervision: Setting People Up for Success, Cengage Learning, 409-410.
Chiu, M. M. (2000): Group problem solving processes: Social interactions and individual actions, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 1, 27-50.600-631.
Chiu, M. M. (2008): Flowing toward correct contributions during groups' mathematics problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17 (3), 415 – 463.
C. R. Graham, W. Woodfield, dan J. B. Harrison (2013): A framework for Institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education, Internet High. Educ., 18, 4–14, Jul.
D. Parsons, (2012): Refining Current Practices in Mobile and Blended Learning: New Applications, Hershey, PA, USA: IGI.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999): Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series., New York, Elsevier Science, Inc. 1999.
E. Rahimi, J. van den Berg, dan W. Veen (2015): Facilitating student-driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments, Comput. Educ., 81, 235–246.
E. Y. Huang, S. W. Lin, dan T. K. Huang (2012): What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction, Comput. Educ., 58, 1, 338–349.
Fraenkel, J. R. dan Wallen, N. E. (2009): How to design and evaluate reseach in education, Mc Graw Hill Higher Education, 7th edition.
F. Alonso, D. Manrique, L. Martinez, dan J. M. Vines (2011): How blended learning reduces under achievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences, IEEE Trans. Educ., 54, 3, 471–478.
F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, dan P. B.Kantor, Eds. Boston, MA (2011): Recommender Systems Handbook, USA: Springer.
Gilakjani dan Abbas Pourhossein (2012): Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching, Journal of Studies in Education, vol 2, no 1.
G. Attwell (2007): Personal learning environments—The future of eLearning?, Lifelong Learn., vol. 2, 1–8.
G. Salmon (2013): E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning, 2nd ed.New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
H. Beetham dan R. Sharpe (2013): Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning, 2nded. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
James, W. B., dan Blank, W. E. (1993): Review and critique of available learning-style instruments for adults. In D. Flannery (Ed.), Applying cognitive learning styles (pp. 47-58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
L. C. Sarasin (1999): Learning Style Perspectives-impact in the classroom, Atwood Publishing, Madison, WI, 1999.
L. Oliveira dan F. Moreira (2010): Personal learning environments: Integration of Web 2.0 applications and content management systems, in Proc. 11th Eur. Conf. Knowl. Manag, vol. 2.
L. T. M. Blessing dan A. Chakrabarti (2009): DRM, a Design Research Methodology, 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2009.
M. Holenko Dlab dan N. Hoic-Bozic (2009): An approach to adaptivity and collaboration support in a web-based learning environment, Int. J.Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 28–30.
M. Holenko Dlab dan N. Hoic-Bozic (2014): Recommender system for Web 2.0 supported elearning, in Proc. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conf. (EDUCON 2014), pp. 953–956.
M. Holenko Dlab (2014): Recommender system for activities in computer-supported collaborative learning, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
N. Islam dan N. Azad (2015): Satisfaction and continuance with a learning management system: Comparing perceptions of educators and students, Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., vol. 32, no. 2.
N. Manouselis, H. Drachsler, R. Vuorikari, H. Hummel, dan R. Koper (2011): Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning, in Recommender Systems Handbook, F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B.Kantor, Eds. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 387–415.
P. Anderson (2007): What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education, Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, 1–64.
P. Brusilovsky dan N. Henze (2007): Open corpus adaptive educational hypermedia, in The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, P.Brusilovsky, A.Kobsa, and W.Neidl, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 671–696.
R. Keeling (2006): The bologna process and the Lisbon research agenda : The European commission's expanding role in higher education discourse, Eur. J. Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 203–223.
R. Osguthorpe dan C. Graham (2003): Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions”, Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, 227–233.
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.